FaceBook Hack Reveals Trend in Targeting Social Networks

Attacking social networking websites is becoming more common all the time. My guess is that they are being leveraged by criminals, who are after the vast amount of personal information people willingly put up on these sites.

For the past couple of weeks, the ongoing attack on FaceBook has figured prominently in the media. The attack isn't much different than some of the other ones we've seen in recent years – which are to take over a user account – and then use it to trick people into falling for a scam. In this instance, a phishy link is being used to direct the effort.

The intended victim receives a communication from someone they know (who has already been compromised), which directs them to a page that appears to be a FaceBook login. They are then prompted to put in their user name and password. If they do, their information is stolen and will be used to trick even more people into doing the same thing.

Stealing stolen user accounts on eBay has been a problem for years. On eBay, it is a means of using an established seller's credentials to trick people into thinking they are dealing with a "trusted seller." The only difference here is that instead of selling bogus or non-existent merchandise, the intent on FaceBook is probably to trick people into giving up personal or financial information.

This information can then be used to commit financial crimes, using the victim’s identity.

I found some information about the FaceBook attack on Symantec's Security Response blog. Thus far, according to the research conducted on this at their lab, no computers have been infected.

According to Marian Meritt at Symantec, the danger of giving up your FaceBook credentials might go beyond having your account compromised. She believes the hackers behind this are looking to compromise other accounts, where you might use the same credentials. I read some other articles on this and thus far this seems to be the consensus of why the attack is occurring, but no one seems to know for sure.

Whether this is the intent, or not – the advice given in the post is something that should be considered when dealing with the multiple accounts a lot of us have.

First and foremost, you should pay attention to the address in the bar at the top of your page. If it is not exactly the address of the legitimate site, you are probably being tricked into thinking that it is. For instance, www.faceboot.com is not www.facebook.com. Even better, if you spot a suspicious link, hover your mouse on it (without clicking on it) and the actual address will appear at the bottom left-hand of the page. Entering the legitimate address in your address bar is always smarter than clicking on a link, too.

Of course, it's also wise to check out the address at the top of the page after arriving at your destination, also. You should also stop and think when something pops up instructing you to enter your user and password information.

Also recommended is to use complex and unique passwords for each of your accounts, maintain an up-to-date browser and operating system and use updated security software from a reliable vendor.

When purchasing security software, ensure you are not buying counterfeit software or being tricked into purchasing scareware. Scareware is bogus security software that normally prompts a user to run a scan of their system, which reflects all kinds of bad things going on. The problem is that the problems normally do not really exist and the protection they are selling doesn't really protect you, either.

So far as buying counterfeit software, it normally doesn't protect you very well and it might even have some malicious code built right into the program.

While the FaceBook attack is the flavor of the week, it’s not the only social networking site that has been targeted in the recent past. Twitter and MySpace have been the targets of recent attacks, too. SC Magazine did a recent article where a security researcher from Websense was quoted as saying they have detected more than 200,000 sites impersonating the above mentioned social networking sites.

Going beyond social networking sites, financial, auction, e-commerce are frequently attacked, too. The common denominator is sites where criminals can harvest information and turn it into money. Please note that people interested in doing a little bit of due diligence on you personally might see what you are putting up on these sites. I’ve recently seen this presented as a “best practice” when doing background checks on people.

The key is to adopt the known best practices if you enjoy using these sites. Another wise thing to do is to be extremely thoughtful about what information you post on them and how it might be used against you.

Anything you post on these sites can and will be used against you if the wrong person gets their hands on it. In the end, being mindful of the information you are posting on a social networking site is probably the best defense you have. After all, you never know who is looking at it!

0 comments

Symantec Indian Call Center Employee Selling Credit Card Details (Shocking)!

A story of an undercover investigation by the BBC shows how dishonest employees at call centers — who collect plastic payment card details on clients — might be making a little extra pocket change by selling them.

The focus of the BBC story is centered on an Indian call center employee for Symantec Security Corporation stealing payment card information. It is also centered on UK customers, which is understandable given it is the BBC, but the reality is that information is stolen then sold from countries all over the world.

Payment card details are handled by telephone at call centers in a lot of places and the calls come from all over, too. A lot of companies have different tiers (levels of personnel) handling calls, depending on the difficulty or nature of the call. At a lot of major companies, these tiers are located in different centers, which are in different countries. Any call might start in one country and, given the nature of the call, it could be transferred to another center located in another country. Given this, payment card information can be sent and then illicitly recorded over a fairly wide geographical area.

Besides that, dishonest employees are caught on a regular basis in a lot of different places. They don't all necessarily reside in India and call centers there are not the only place payment card information can be compromised. In fact, payment card information can be compromised anywhere (not just call centers) where they are used at a point of sale.

Information crooks are recruited and some think even planted anywhere financial information can be stolen. Even if they are not, payment card details are being bartered in forums on the Internet. It probably wouldn't be very hard to find a place to sell credit/debit card information when all it takes to do it is a click of a mouse.

The BBC story, which aired on video, chronicles an investigative effort by their reporters on the streets of Delhi. In the segment, it shows reporters making contact with the underground broker, who offers them payment card details from "all over the world" for $10-$12, each. It then shows a buy being made and money changing hands.

When the information was checked, it revealed that only one in seven card numbers were actually usable. They were able to trace some of the good numbers to a call center handling Symantec (Norton) products. The story stated that there has only been one successful prosecution in India for this type of crime and that it netted a non-custodial sentence. It also stated that the laws regarding the protection of data are not as stringent as they are in some places. The story mentions that Symantec's official comment was that it was an isolated incident and that the employee was removed.

Since one to seven card details turned out to be real, I guess we can assume the underground broker wasn't being completely honest. I've also seen reports of credit card details being sold for a lot less and you don't have to travel to India to find them.

In November, Symantec — the point of compromise in the story — issued a report on the underground economy, which focused on this very subject. "Credit cards are also typically sold in bulk, with lot sizes from as few as 50 credit cards to as many as 2,000. Common bulk amounts and rates observed by Symantec during this reporting period were 50 credit cards for $40 ($0.80 each), 200 credit cards for $150 ($0.75 each), and 2,000 credit cards for $200 ($0.10 each)," according to the report.

If this report is anywhere near accurate and the BBC was buying card details at $10-$12 each — if only one to seven was good in the Delhi exchange — the BBC was getting ripped off!

According to the 68-page report by Symantec, these details can be bought anywhere that has an Internet connection. Counterfeit instruments (ready to use) are often sent through the mail, too. The information is sold via IRC (Internet relay chat) channels in forums designed to market stolen financial information. Although credit/debit card details seem to dominate the scene, a lot of other information is sold that can be used to commit financial crimes and identity theft in these forums, too.

If you don't want to believe the Symantec report, the FBI took down one of these forums not very long ago. This forum known as Dark Market was responsible for about $70 million in fraud, worldwide. My best guess is that the information in the report is pretty accurate.

Although dishonest insiders are the cause of a portion of it, we should remember that hackers breaking into business systems, phishing, malicious software and even the trash can be sources of stolen information. The places targeted for information can be merchants, restaurants, goverment organizations, charity organizations, universities, medical facilities or anywhere payment card information is used at a point of sale.

Keeping up with all the points of compromise is difficult, but one place that attempts to is the DataLossDB site. Please note that the unknown data breaches are the most lucrative for the criminals behind this activity. Once a breach is discovered, measures are enacted to disable the stolen data.

It can be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to identify the point of compromise in most individual cases. The reason for this is there are too many different places where information might have been stolen from.

Maybe that's the problem, or we are storing and transmitting too much information all over the place? Since everyone is making money by transmitting information, I doubt this practice is going to stop anytime soon. So far as outsourcing, I doubt this is going to stop in the near term, either. Companies save a lot of payroll by outsourcing jobs. Payroll is a big expense for corporations and cutting payroll seems to be in vogue these days.

Nothing is going to change until laws are passed that force everyone making money from this information start doing the right things. This includes laws that prohibit people from being irresponsible (my opinion) to laws that punch the criminals stealing the information where it hurts.

Until then, the rest of us will have to batten down the hatches and weather the storm. I highly recommend making sure your information is protected as well as it can be (there are no guarantees) by protecting your own electronic transmissions. Monitoring financial activity — from your financial statements to information on your credit report and the Internet — is a good idea, too. Of course, while doing this, you need to ensure your electronic transmissions are protected by a reliable vendor and that you aren't paying for protection that you could get for free. Sadly enough, everyone claiming they can protect you isn't necessarily being completely honest, either.

0 comments

FTC Warns FreeCreditReport.com is NOT FREE

Identity theft is a serious subject, and according to recent reports, it's a growing problem. Because identity theft is out of control (personal opinion) and has victimized a lot of people, it's spawned a cottage industry that sells protection at a price. Critics, including the FTC, believe a lot of these identity theft companies are selling services that are supposed to be free.

If you've watched TV in the past year, you've probably seen the ads for FreeCreditReport.com. These ads have urban minstrels (guitar dudes) singing about the woes of people who have had their identities stolen or made poor credit choices. The idea is to get you to go to FreeCreditReport.com, which isn't exactly free. If you read the fine print when you sign up at this site for your free credit report, you are actually authorizing them to bill your credit/debit card $14.95 a month for eternity. This ads up to $179.40 a year.

That doesn't exactly sound like it's free, does it? You can cancel within the first seven days, but given their immense advertising budget, it appears not very many people do or seem to have a problem cancelling the service. Even worse, a lot of people who signed up for their service probably aren't even aware that they could have actually gotten their credit report for free elsewhere.

Under federal law, anyone is entitled to get their credit report for free. To bring attention to this, the FTC (Federal Trade Commission) has launched an awareness campaign entitled "FTC Releases Humorous Videos with a Serious Message About AnnualCreditReport.com."

AnnualCreditReport.com is the only source authorized to give out free credit reports under federal law. The law, which is part of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, guarantees anyone access to a free credit report from each of the big three credit reporting agencies — Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion — every twelve months.

The reason for this campaign was the large volume of complaints from consumers, who thought they were getting something for free, but were not. The FTC is warning the public not to be fooled by TV ads, e-mail offers, or ads on the Internet.

Please note that little to nothing is done to make sure these ads and or spam messages offering protection are legitimate. These ads and spam e-mails might actually come from fraudsters. Answering one of them might lead to a person having their identity stolen.

There are other reasons not to hand over your personal information to the wrong organization. We live in a world where hackers and identity thieves breach databases with an alarming frequency. If you are handing over personal information to one of these companies, they might be maintaining it in a database where it could be stolen. Also, there is no guarantee that your personal information isn't going to be stolen by a dishonest insider. Because information is often outsourced and electronically transmitted all over the world, a lot of people can end up having access to it. All it takes is one dishonest person to decide to steal it and sell it to someone else.

Information is worth a lot of money, and besides dishonest insiders, data brokers and the credit bureaus sell it all the time for marketing purposes. Having information in too many places is a common denominator in a lot of people who become an identity theft victim.

AnnualCreditReport.com is the only place to get a free credit report authorized by the government. I would trust my information with them a lot more than some of the places I see advertising identity theft protection.

Free reports can be requested online, by phone or by mail. To get your free credit report online go to AnnualCreditReport.com, call 1-877-322-8228, or fill out the Annual Credit Report Request form and mail it to Annual Credit Report Request Service, P.O. Box 105281, Atlanta, GA 30348-5281. You have the option of requesting all three reports at once or you can order one report at a time. A lot of users of this service order one every few months to monitor their credit on a more frequent basis without having to pay for it.

If you see items on your report that are inaccurate, the FTC provides a tutorial on their site on how to dispute credit errors. If you think you have become an identity theft statistic, you may need to place a fraud alert on your credit report, close compromised accounts, file a complaint with the FTC, or file a police report. A tutorial is also provided to help consumers do this on FTC’s identity theft Web site.

Besides the FTC site on identity theft, I recommend the Identity Theft Resource Center and the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse as excellent free resources to learn how to prevent identity theft and recover from it.

If you think you've been tricked to paying for a credit report, the FTC is asking that you let them know about it by filing a complaint. Additionally, if you receive any spam e-mails offering free credit reports, the FTC asks that you send them to spam@uce.gov.

Spam e-mails offering free credit reports can be phishing attempts, which are designed to trick you into giving up your personal information. They can also contain malicious software, which will steal all the information off your computer, automatically. Either way, answering one or even clicking on a link in one can make you an identity theft victim.

Credit reports don't necessarily catch all forms of identity theft. Sometimes different parts of people's identities are used to forge a synthetic one. This phenomenon has been dubbed synthetic identity theft. Quite often, because a lot of the information doesn't match, the credit bureaus don't pick it up.

Other examples where a credit bureau might not reveal identity theft are medical benefit fraud, employment fraud, government benefit fraud, some forms of check fraud and when it is used to commit crimes of other than a financial nature.

In the recent past, this has been discovered by many during tax season, when they get a bill for taxes that an identity thief never paid to the government. A lot of experts recommend that you watch your yearly Social Security statement carefully because of this. Identities are stolen to file fraudulent tax returns or used to obtain employment.

As a bonus, I am going to include what I consider an interesting post from Kelly Sonora over on the e-Justice blog. In this post, Kelly provides 25 tools that can be used to monitor information about yourself, see what is being said about your business, search for information about yourself and find public records that relate to your personal information. A prudent person can even set up alerts on some of these tools so they are automatically notified of any new information.

Please note, Kelly's blog post is not sanctioned by the FTC, but nonetheless, I think it's a neat set of tools that a lot of people might find useful.

As a final bonus — here is a parody (courtesy of the FTC) warning us all the the guitar dude's free credit report isn't free:

0 comments

Downadup/Conficker Worm Disables Computer Security

If you were a hacker or a e-scam artist with malicious intent, would it be valuable to disable a machine's security system? Most of them find it relatively easy to take command and control of unprotected machines, but fully patched and protected machines pose more of a challenge.

Since late last year, hackers have developed a new tool that attacks protected machines, known as the Downadup/Conficker worm. This worm is being called a complex piece of malicious code that is able jump network hurdles, hide in the shadows and even defend itself against security measures, according to a recent report by Symantec.

Symantec has documented its blog posts on this subject in this report, which are available on their site. They also have a blog post by Ben Nahorney that attempts to put this complex threat into terms that can be understood by the general public.

Just this month, Symantec identified the third version of Downadup/Conficker, which has an even more powerful punch designed to take down computer security systems. This version has been dubbed the W32.Downadup.C variant and is still under analysis. The payload from W32.Downadup.C is set is to be triggered on April 1st, and if it is, the damage from it could be huge. SC Magazine aptly summed this up in an article called, "No Joke — Conficker Worm set to explode on April Fool's Day."

Since Downadup/Conficker has the ability to replicate itself — even on USB drives and network shares — by cracking passwords, it can spread like wildfire and wreak havoc on systems.
The report concludes that this is only the beginning of the Downadup/Conficker threat. If you take the time to read through the report, it shows how this malware is evolving and changing to avoid attempts to stop the spread of it.

It is being reported that Downadup Conficker has enabled one of the largest botnets to be formed on the Internet because of the number of systems that aren't protected from it. Of course, it appears that once infected, the worm itself might prevent the patches from be downloaded on a machine.

Botnets generate all the spam we see in our in boxes and are the vehicle of most fraud, phishing and financial misdeeds seen on the Internet. They consist of infected computers that have been taken over and form a super computer capable of spreading a lot of garbage. Of course, becoming infected can also mean that all your personal and financial information will be data-mined and used by less than honest people to steal money or commit other types of crimes.

Information can be stolen to commit espionage or even provide a fake identities, which are then used to support other more serious criminal activity. Although a lot of espionage is industrial, it is on record already that Downadup/Conficker infected computers at the U.K. Ministry of Defence and the Houston Municipal Courts which suggest a more sinister intent than merely committing financial crimes.

Since the beginning of the year, there are different estimates of how many computers are infected, but all them seem to agree it's somewhere around nine million.

Microsoft has announced a $250,000 reward for information leading to the arrest of the authors of this code. It has also announced an industry-wide coalition to fix the threat that Downadup/Conficker poses. Included in this coalition are ICANN, NeuStar, Symantec, CNNIC, Afilias, Public Internet Registry, Global Domains International Inc., M1D Global, AOL, Verisign, F-Secure, ISC, researchers from Georgia Tech, the Shadowserver Foundation, Arbor Networks and Support Intelligence.

Microsoft also provides information on patches and the latest developments on Conficker/Downadup on its site. It also has another page where you can learn more about these types of threats and how to stay safe online.

0 comments

RSA Report Points to an Increase in Cyber Crime

According to a recent report from RSA Security, phishing attacks increased 66 percent last year when compared to 2007. One reason cited for this are the increased availability of DIY (do-it-yourself) phishing kits, which are available for sale on the Internet.

Some of these kits even come with tech support. In the past few years, these kits have enabled a lot more people to get into the phishing game.

The statistics compiled in the Anti-Fraud Command Center Phishing Trends Report recorded 135,426 phishing attacks compared to 90,000 detected in 2007. Despite these ominous numbers, the report showed a marked decrease in the number of attacks between June and July. The amount of attacks then increased steadily until the end of the year and then dropped again in December. The RSA team attributed this to a drop in activity by a notorious gang of phishermen, known as the Rock Phish.

Although, no one seems to be exactly sure, the Rock Phish are a phishing gang that are allegedly of Romanian origin. Experts believe they are responsible for up to 50 percent of the phishing seen in the wild (on the Internet) today. To avoid detection, Rock Phishing attacks often update DNS records during an attack and change URLs, which confuse take-down efforts and allow them to bypass spam filters. They also use images in their spam e-mails, which make their work harder to be detected by spam filters. A lot of spam filters do not use OCR (optical character recognition) because it slows down the filtering process.

The (temporary?) reduction in attacks was attributed to the Rock Phish upgrading their infrastructure and switching to the use of a new botnet, called the "Asprox botnet."

A lot of the newer botnets — which spew out spam in the millions using zombies (compromised computers) — are using what is known are using fast flux technology. Fast flux is a DNS technique used to hide spam e-mails behind a constantly changing network of compromised computers (zombies), which have been taken over using malicious software to send out spam. Since these spam e-mails recruit new zombies all the time, it makes shutting down this type of activity pretty difficult. According to the report, fast flux attacks now comprise about half of all the activity out there.

From a global perspective, the United Kingdom (40 percent) was the most attacked country followed by the United States (37 percent). This was attributed to a focused attack on a number of financial institutions in the UK in 2008. The report also acknowledges increased activity in Latin America and the Pacific. A lot of experts believe we will see increased activity in other parts of the world as more people from these regions are introduced to the Internet. As this takes place, more computers will be compromised (become zombies) in these countries and the statistics will shift.

It should be noted that despite the increased activity in the United Kingdom, the United States still holds the dubious honor of being number one in hosting phishing attacks. They are also number one in brand names being attacked.

Of no surprise is the statistic that financial instituions are the favorite target in these attacks. It makes sense that the phishermen will continue to go where the money is and with the sour economy, there are a lot of social engineering lures that are ripe for exploitation. Fear is a time-honored social engineering lure, which gets people to click on links they should not have.

The conclusion of the report is that online crime continues to evolve, is becoming more dangerous, and new tools are being used to further the effort. My guess is that it will continue to grow as long as we focus on defending against it instead of going after the source of it! Of course, this is merely the opinion of this observer.

0 comments

Spammers Love to Hurt Internet Users

Love is a many splendored social engineering tool and spammers are busy sending out a whole lot of their particular brand of love across the electronic universe.

An interesting blog post (Love Hurts) by Kevin Haley at Symantec points out that malicious code writers are busy spreading their work in attachments hidden in the millions of spam messages being spewed out by zombies (compromised computers). If you click on one of these attachments — and your machine isn't bulletproof — it also can become a zombie and used as part of a botnet to send out more spam. Botnets are groups of compromised computers used to form a super computer. Of course, downloading malware can also mean that all your personal and financial information will be stolen, too. Please note (as you will see below) that some forms of malware currently being sent out can do both.

Kevin's blog post came out at almost the same time Symantec issued it's monthly Spam Landscape Report. With Valentine's Day coming up, love is a predictable lure and it's probably a good idea to make sure you know who loves you before clicking on any links in an e-mail.

Another predictable finding in the report is that spam levels are continuing to rise to normal levels after they fell when McColo was shut-down. McColo (a Web service hosting provider) was shut down in November after it was discovered they were the source of a large number of botnets, which are used to send out spam. Last month, 79 percent of all e-mail was spam. The report also notes that the point of origin for spam is shifting a little. Although the United States is still number one, the number of active zombies in other countries is rising. While some of this is being attributed to McColo, the report points out that this might point to the fact that some of these countries have an increasing number of users accessing the Internet.

From a spam-commerce point of view, the report indicates weight loss products, counterfeit drugs, cheap watches and porn top the list of items available at super-cheap prices as Valentine's Day approaches.

Besides Valentine's Day, President Obama also continues to be used as a spam lure, according to the report. A lot of this spam contains malware with files names such as usa.exe, obamanew.exe, statement.exe, barackblog.exe and barackspeech.exe. The malware being spread in these spam e-mails is called the W32.Waledac, which is capable of both stealing sensitive personal and financial information and turning a machine into a zombie. It also establishes a backdoor to a machine so it can be remotely accessed.

Current events (and holidays) have been and probably will continue to be used as social engineering lures to snare the unwary.

Also noted was a rise in Russian spam hawking goods and services. With cheap long distance services using VoIP, the Russians have actually set up telephone numbers for their intended victims to call. My guess is that they will entice someone to send money, which can't be recovered when the person sending it discovers they've been scammed.

Chinese gambling spam is also mentioned as a new phenomenon in the report. It appears to be patterned after English language gambling spam, but is written in Chinese.

Last, but not least, Nigerian spam is mentioned. Nigerian or 419 spam is named after the section of the Nigerian penal code dealing with fraud. It normally is a come-on for lost riches or winning a lottery and has a lot of spelling and grammatical errors. Typically known as advance fee fraud, the victim is enticed in sending money across a border (wire transfer is preferred) to secure their fortune. Of course in the end, the victim never receives anything and is often left in financial ruin.

There are many twists to advance fee and one of them is to send a bogus financial instrument to a person with instructions to cash it. If the person doesn't get arrested for presenting it, they are instructed to send the money back to the scammer. Of course, the cashing institution eventually figures out the instrument is bogus and the victim is held liable for it.

A lot of people think that advance fee all comes from Nigeria, which isn't true. I've personally traced it to a lot of other places and called some of the telephone numbers. The person answering didn't sound Nigerian and I've spoken to a few people from Nigeria in my time. Naturally, this doesn't mean that scam activity is not coming from Nigeria and just that not all of it does.

Pam Dixon, of the World Privacy Forum, went on record recently that the spelling and grammatical errors aren't being seen as much in advance fee lures anymore. Obviously, advance fee scammers, wherever they hail from, are being more careful and have discovered spell check?

To close, the Anti-Phishing Working Group's recent report on phishing, which is delivered via spam, has noted that the number of crimeware-spreading URLs out there has increased 258 percent versus the same time period last year. It also noted a record high in the amount of hijacked and victimized brand names. Last but not least, it noted another record in the amount of malicious application variants being seen in the wild (on the Internet).

This would suggest that spam is getting more dangerous and the people sending it are becoming more sophisticated. The smartest thing to do with all spam is to delete it. Making sure your computer's security is updated with a known and reliable vendor is also a smart thing to do. After all, as I've speculated many times before, most fraud, phishing and financial misdeeds on the Internet start with spam.

0 comments

Increase in Scams Attributed to Economy

I just finished reading an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal by M. P. McQueen, which suggests that the bear market is creating a bull market for fraudsters. According to the numerous experts cited in the article, the reason for this is economic gloom and doom with a healthy dose of anxiety.

This shouldn't be surprising because gloom, doom, and anxiety make effective social engineering tools that can be used to part people and businesses from their money.

The article references phishing expeditions that lead to fake Web sites — which often spoof a financial institution or government entity — and entice people into giving up enough of their personal details to drain their financial resources. It also mentions that some of these sites leave behind malicious software on a person's machine, which steal all these details automatically.
Also mentioned is the use of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol), caller-ID spoofing and cell phone technology to mount texting and vishing attacks. Vishing is merely another method of tricking people to give up personal and financial information via the telephone. In these attacks, the caller ID is spoofed to make it appear as if it is coming from a legitimate institution.

Apparently telephone technology is being used to commit other types of crimes, too. Many of our 911 centers cannot identify spoofed calls coming from computers using VoIP technology. This has led to S.W.A.T. teams being tricked into deploying in full battle gear to residential neighborhoods when no emergency existed. Of course, businesses use the same technology to trick people who have caller ID into picking up their telephones. You can even buy a card to do this at will from any telephone right over the Web.

It sometimes amazes me how much irresponsible technology there is out there, which is being sold legally. There are even Web sites, with disclaimers, that specialize in making this technology available to the general public. Of course, there are also complete DIY (do-it-yourself) phishing kits being sold over the Internet. Some of these even come with tech support. The phishing kits are illegal, but can be found for sale in chat rooms if you know where to look for them. Sadly, the truth is that these chat rooms aren't very hard to find. The fine line between legitimate enterprise and scams is often a little blurry.

The WSJ article quotes a lot of experts, including Gartner, the FBI and the National White Collar Crime Center, who all seem to agree that scams are on the rise. An interesting phenomenon called out were small fraud charges being found on accounts. I guess taking small amounts, which might be mistaken for bank fees, is a good way to stay under the radar. A lot of people don't realize how many small fees are being charged to their account and it can be quite confusing at times. I guess the crooks are trying to make themselves look like bankers (speculation) and it's probably a good time for all of us to review our statements, carefully.

Speaking of fees, which are used as revenue streams by a lot of businesses, the WSJ put out another article this entitled, "In the Fight Against Bill Creep, Every Extra Fee Is the Enemy." Besides being on the look out for cyber scammers, this article points out other reasons it is smart to review our financial statements with a keen eye these days.

Another notable trend in the past 12 months is executives being targeted. In this trend, specific people within organizations are being targeted and tricked into downloading malicious software on machines. In one of these scams last April, the targets were led to believe they were being subpoenaed to testify in federal court.

Last, but not least, the article points out that job scams are on the rise. It's a well established fact that job sites from Monster to Craigslist have scammers operating on them to recruit people to launder money, cash bogus financial instruments or give up all their personal and financial information. Adding fuel to this fire, it was disclosed recently that Monster.com had been hacked.

Capping off this interesting article — which is a pretty good recap of recent scam activity — is Pam Dixon of the World Privacy Forum pointing out that scammers have learned how to use "spell check." In the past, one of the best ways to identify a scam was it's lack of proper spelling and grammar. While the scammers might have have learned to use spell check, it might also point out that there are more and more people out of work (with better grammar skills), who are becoming scammers.

The WSJ quoted a lot of experts that agree with them that scam activity is on the rise. Another interesting read supporting this (not mentioned in their article) is the recent report that was commissioned by McAfee. This report points to all the unsecured data out there that is fueling the rise in cyber crime. They estimate, at this point, that the financial implications have reached $1 trillion. They also have some interesting information about social engineering and how it is being currently used to commit scams in the current economic environment in another set of articles on their main site.

In my opinion, it makes sense that scams of all kinds are on the rise. There is a lot of confusion going on and people are getting desperate. It might be desperation that is causing more people to get involved in scams on both sides of the fence. For the majority of us, who just want to ride these times out and survive the mayhem, the best thing to probably do is be extra diligent in our financial matters and use a little good old fashioned common sense.

Having dealt with a few scammers in my life, I've found that most of them aren't the most intelligent people around. The best thing to do is to think carefully before jumping in anything of a financial nature these days.

0 comments

Twitter Users (Including Barack and Britney) Hacked and Phished

The Phishermen (and probably a few women) are always looking for fresh waters to hook some unsuspecting phish — so it should be no surprise that Twitter is their latest target. After all, e-mail, cell phones, and Facebook have already been phished, along with countless desktops and laptops.

According to a Symantec blog post, Twitter users are receiving warning messages from Twitter command and control about this matter. The blog post by Marian Meritt, the Internet Safety Guru at Symantec, gives blogger Chris Pirillo credit for breaking the story on Saturday. According to the blog post at Symantec, the messages appear to come from someone you know at Twitter with a link to a malicious website designed to steal information.

Twitter also put up a warning on their blog. It starts with a Wikipedia definition of phishing and then details how the phishing attack will come in the form of an e-mail message notifying a person they have a Twitter Direct Message. Thus far, the social engineering lures being used in the e-mail go something like this: "Hey! check out this funny blog about you..." and direct the user to click on a link to a fake website.

They also point out that if you look at the URL you'll see that it is not the same as the URL for the normal landing page for Twitter. A trick to do this (without clicking on the link) is to hover your mouse pointer over the link. If you look at the bottom left portion of your page it will display the URL the link goes to. With all the malware people can get nowadays by just visiting (driving-by) a malicious page — this is a much safer way to go about it rather instead of actually clicking on the link to find it.



Twitter blog picture showing where to look for a suspicious URL

Authentic looking phishing sites aren't hard to create. Often the hacker merely copies the pictures of a legitimate site and puts them on a compromised (hacked) site so the activity can't be traced back to them. Hackers frequently seek out sites with poor security to compromise and put up their own (malicious) site.

Also contained in the blog entry are instructions on what to do if you've been phished. Basically, they direct you to their password reset tool and a legitimate e-mail will be sent to you so you can change your password.

Interestingly enough, Twitter also reported this morning that 33 prominent Twitter-ers were hacked over the weekend. Apparently, the notables included President-elect Obama, Rick Sanchez, and Britney Spears. According to Twitter, this attack has nothing to do with the phishing expedition into their waters. Apparently, someone hacked into some of the tools their support team uses to help people with their e-mail.

They also pointed out that Mr. Obama hasn't been twittering lately due to issues with the transition.

0 comments

E-Cards with a Dangerous Twist Spotted on the Internet

(Courtesy of Websense)

With the holiday season upon us, spam campaigns of a malicious nature will start springing up bearing yuletide greetings.

Just the other day, Websense sent out an alert that malicious software authors already are using social engineering techniques with a Christmas theme to compromise your home machine. The instance they are reporting uses spam e-mails offering free animated postcards.

Those unfortunate enough to attempt to get free e-cards will download a Trojan. The spam e-mails are spoofed to appear as if they come from postcard.org. The fact that malware (postcard.exe) is being installed on a machine is covered up with a xmas.jpg image.

Quite simply, once installed it allows cyber-scrooges to control your machine and or steal all the personal and financial information off it. The information is then normally used to steal money.

This type of attack is nothing new and seems to surface every year at this time. The next step in these campaigns normally are more personalized spam e-mails designed to do the same thing (download malware). Please note these e-mails are normally spoofed to appear as if they come from a legitimate e-card retailer.

Last year, American Greetings put up a page on their site to educate people how to spot and avoid falling victim to this type of attack. First and foremost, they recommend that if you are suspicious at all to go to the company site and try to pick up the greeting from there. Most (if not all) of the legitimate sites offer this service. The page on their site contains additional ways to identify "e-card garbage" and is well worth a look if you are unfamiliar with how to spot malware attacks using spam e-mails.

American Greeting put up this page after an attack on their brand. In this attack, some of the e-mails appeared to come from a known (trusted) person. My guess is this happened from an already compromised machine, where a spammer gained access to an address book and sent the e-mails out. Some forms of malware do this without any human interface.

I went to the Postcards.org site and thus far they have no warnings about this that I could find.

While the best thing to do is to avoid clicking on spam e-mail containing malware, the second best thing is to employ solid anti-virus software and a firewall from a reputable vendor like Websense, Sunbelt, or Symantec. Most of these vendors are on top of malware being issued in the wild (on the Internet) and they even share information with each other.

0 comments

Telephone Call Offering to Lower Interest Rate is a Scam!

Cheap long distance, the ability to spoof caller ID and the credit crisis are being used to facilitate a scam called vishing. Although telephone (telemarketing) scams are nothing new, the term vishing probably came about because advances in telephone technology are being used to depart unsuspecting people of their hard-earned money.

The term vishing was coined from the word phishing. Internet scammers phish the waters of the Internet using spam e-mail as bait. Once a person falls for their "too good to be true" lure -- personal and financial information is stolen using social engineering (trickery) or malicious software designed to data-mine the information right off the infected machine. The personal and financial information is then used to commit financial crimes, which is often referred to as identity theft.

In the past week, I've received several calls where a computerized voice informs me that the offer to lower my interest rate is almost over. It then says to press "1" if I want to lower my interest rate.

I went ahead and pressed the number "1" to see what this "too good to be true" offer was all about. After a few seconds, a female voice came on and asked me if I was interested in lowering my interest rate. I told her I was and she asked me for the 800 number of my financial institution so she could verify my eligibility. Since this is public information, I went ahead and gave one to an institution, I no longer do business with. While I was digging up the number on the Internet, she made a lot of inquires about how many lines of credit I was behind on. After providing her with the 800 number, she asked me to give her all the credit card numbers that I wanted to lower the interest rate on.

At this point, I had very little doubt I was dealing with a scam designed to steal credit card numbers. At no point did she identify a financial institution -- and besides that -- no financial institution would make a cold call and ask for credit card numbers. Additionally, when was the last time a financial institution offered to lower an interest rate to an existing customer unless they were being bailed out by the government (taxpayer)?

I asked if she felt good about ripping people off and if I could speak to her supervisor. Of course, I was never referred to a supervisor and after cursing at me, she hung up. Trust me, from the vulgar language that was expressed, this call was not being recorded for training purposes!

In the past couple of years, we've seen reports of vishing. In the case, I'm writing about a dialer system is obviously being used. Dialers are used by collection agencies, telemarketing companies, political campaigns and even charities to direct calls to live employees. Basically, dialers screen the calls via computer to make the process more efficient.

Having never priced one, I decided to see what Google had to offer. I found them to be rather inexpensive starting at a mere few hundred dollars. There were also options to use already set-up systems on a cost-per-call basis.

Caller-ID spoofing services can be purchased legally and are used by a lot of legitimate companies to entice us to pick up calls. Because of this, it is probably wise not to put your faith in caller-ID.

Some blame VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technology for vishing. VoIP has made calling long distance cheap.

So far as where the victim lists are obtained, they can be easily purchased. My phone number has been unlisted for over 20 years, but information brokers data-mine information from every source imaginable, including magazine subscriptions. Since these lists are worth money, companies who gather information routinely sell the marketing information they gather on all of us. It also isn't unknown for dishonest employees to sell information directly to criminals. Often this is done right on the Internet in chat rooms, which keeps the transaction fairly anonymous.

Recently, the FBI announced that they stung an Internet forum used to sell stolen information known as Dark Market. At it's peak, the group had 2500 registered members and it is estimated that they prevented losses of $70 million (worldwide) by cracking this case.

Even the IRS and Social Security have been impersonated in the past two years in vishing schemes.

InsideCRM magazine recently published an article detailing 50 ways to protect your privacy. This magazine represents the call center industry and has a stake in fighting vishing activity, which gives legitimate e-commerce a black eye. If you (like a lot of us) enjoy the hassle-free environment shopping at home, the article is a great educational resource.

The U.S. government has also set up a highly visual and interactive site to educate people about crimes being enabled by technology. Please note this site is available in Espanol, also.

While both of these sites are designed to cover computer security issues in addition to telecom type scams, we need to remember that a lot of these scams probably started before telephones or computers made them easier to do, as well as, more efficient.

Scams rely on human emotion and greed. Knowing this is the best way to prevent yourself from becoming a victim. The "too good to be true" principle coupled with "does the transaction make sense" is the best way to figure out whether an offer is legitimate or NOT!

0 comments

Improved OnGuardOnLine Site Teaches Cyber Safety to the Average Person

One of the better places for the average person to learn about the sometimes murky waters of the Internet is free and sponsored by the Federal Trade Commission. Although OnGuardOnline.gov and AlertaEnLinea.gov, its Spanish-language counterpart have been around for awhile -- some new and exciting improvements have been made to the site with a just released Web 2.0 redesign.

The new and improved site allows users to grab and embed games and videos, search for topics on the site, take a “show of hands” poll, and have a more interactive experience while learning how to avoid becoming an Internet crime statistic.

Articles and games covering sixteen topics -- including social networking, phishing, email scams and laptop security; plenty of buttons and banners you can post on your blog or website; free publications consumers and organizations can order; and links to the OnGuard Online partners from the public and private sector.

I should add that a lot of good people from both the government and private sectors have given resources and their valuable time to assist the Federal Trade Commission with this site. Industry and government partners -- include the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Department of Homeland Security, Internal Revenue Service, United States Postal Inspection Service, Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, Securities and Exchange Commission, National Cyber Security Alliance, Anti-Phishing Working Group, i-SAFE, AARP, National Consumers League, Direct Marketing Association, WiredSafety.org, The SANS Institute, The National Association of Attorneys General, Better Business Bureau, NetFamilyNews, CompTIA, National Crime Prevention Council, Association of College Unions International, and the Latinos in Information Sciences and Technology Association.

In my opinion, this represents a valuable partnership in dealing with the ever growing problem of crime on the Internet. This also represents a very credible collaboration of resources and industry experts (my humble opinion).

There is also a lot of material that businesses and organizations can use to educate their people with. Frequently, I get approached on this subject and I will continue to recommend this site as a valuable resource. Of course, the benefits for the individual person wanting to protect themselves, or become more knowledgeable are there (free for the taking), also.

If you are one of those businesses or organizations wanting additional matertials, you can get free OnGuard Online publications. For 50 or more copies, visit ftc.gov/bulkorder. If you need less than 50 copies, call 1-877-FTC-HELP.

0 comments

Were Internet Scammers Preparing to Exploit Hurricane Gustav?

Gustav has passed and it seems like it wasn't as bad as it could have been. One positive aspect to it all was the emergency responders, who were on top of it this time. They really did a first-class job of ensuring the public's safety and deserve to be commended for their efforts.

Unfortunately, this might not be the case with everyone who was preparing for the worst Gustav might have dished out. Cyber criminals appear to have been positioning themselves on the Internet to divert as much of the relief money as they could get away with. And although it wasn't as bad as it could have been, we might still see these crooks try to take advantage of the situation.

Gary Warner, who is a blogger and computer forensics research type, recently posted a list of names that appear as if they might used to impersonate Gustav relief efforts on his blog. Some of the potential fraud domain names listed include contributiongustav.org, donategustav.org, donationgustav.org, gustav-relief.org, gustavassistance.org, gustavattorney.com, gustavclaims.net, gustavcontribution.org, gustavhelpers.org and gustavlawsuit.com. Many more of these domains can be seen on his blog post.

Gary also pointed to interesting package deal of domain names being offered on eBay. The seller has a 94.1 percent approval rating on eBay and offers to give 10 percent of the purchase price to a charity of the buyer's choice. Additionally, he assures anyone bidding on these names that their User ID will be kept private.

eBay isn't the only e-commerce place selling these domain names, I found some on DNForum.com, also. In fact, DomainPulse.com is reporting that 100 names related to Gustav were registered in less than 48 hours.

The good folks at the SANS Internet Storm Center are also keeping an eye on this activity and have an interesting diary going on about it. They are asking that anyone with any further information about this send them a quick note so they can stay on top of the subject and hopefully report it to the federal authorities.

Whether or not these domain names will be used for fraud is purely speculative at this point. However with the Louisiana Attorney General reporting that phishing attacks using Gustav as a lure have already started, it's probably only a matter of time before some of these sites are used in an attempt to dupe the general public. It should be noted that phishing is a time-tested method used to direct unsuspecting users to fraud websites, where they are tricked out of money via social engineering schemes or can even have malicious software dropped on their operating system. Becoming a Phish normally carries the risk of identity or information theft, also.

Identity theft isn't the only reason malware is dropped on a system. Often the intent is to take over a system and turn it into a member of a botnet so it can be used as a spam spewing zombie. It's always considered wise not to click on links received in e-mails from unknown sources.

The average person can check out if a charity is legitimate by visiting the Better Business Bureau Wise Giving Alliance, Charity Navigator or the American Institute for Philanthropy.

If you happen to detect a site that appears to be fraudulent, the socially responsible thing to do is to report it to Internet Crime Complaint Center.

0 comments

Report Reveals That Internet Fraud Threatens E-Commerce

The Center for American Progress just released a report indicating that not enough is being done to protect the public from fraud on the Internet. It's also warning that the convenience, choices and lower prices enjoyed by Internet users are at risk because of this.

They report reveals that high levels of fraud and abuse may cause more and more consumers to lose trust, a key-component of any successful business. Malicious software, phishing and spam were cited as primary causes for the high levels of fraud and abuse on the Internet.

Studies indicate that over 80 percent of all e-mail is spam. It should be noted that spam is the preferred delivery vehicle of fraud and abuse on the Internet. Malware and phishing normally start with a spam e-mail. In Phishing schemes -- which are designed to steal personal and financial information -- the use of malicious software to automatically steal information is on the rise. In the past, phishing normally relied on a social engineering scheme to accomplish this goal.

The Anti Phishing Working Group, an organization that tracks phishing activity, has noted an increase in the use of malicious software to phish information. They speculate that ability of e-criminals to use automated tools to spread crimeware (a.k.a. malware) could be the reason for the increase.

The report states that although the Federal Trade Commission is stepping up enforcement activity, it's resources are limited and more action by the State attorney generals is desperately needed. It cites as an example that over the past three years, only 11 cases against spyware distributors have been brought forward by the States, which is the same number taken for action by the FTC.

The Center for American Progress and the Center for Democracy and Technology asked States to provide data on the complaints they received 2006 and 2007. Thirty six States responded and most of them had a Internet related category listed in their top-ten complaints. It was also noted that overall Internet related complaints increased from 2006 to 2007. Eight of the States listed Internet related complaints in their top-three and four States listed them as being the number-one complaint.

The FTC, who gathers data on a much wider scale noted an increase of 16,000 Internet related complaints in 2007 versus the number received in 2006. When comparing the numbers to 2005, a 24,000 increase in complaints was noted.

The report points out that many experts speculate that not all cybercrime is reported or even discovered. Additionally, the standard for classifying it varies from State to State, which makes it hard to evaluate current statistical data. Given these factors, many believe the problem is understated.

In looking at the enforcement level by the States, the Center for American Progress and the Center for Democracy and Technology gathered information from annual and biennial reports, websites, news articles, and the bimonthly Cybercrime Newsletter released by the National Association of Attorneys General.

Data from the Cybercrime Newsletter revealed that 60 percent of the cases prosecuted were for the sexual enticement of minors or pornography. Crimes involving the theft of information or identity theft represented 8.9 percent of the total and 15.5 percent involved online sales and services. The majority of the cases involving online sales and services were for false advertising or the quality of a product or service.

The conclusion given by the researchers is that not very many crimes involving phishing, spyware, spam, adware and hacking were being effectively investigated or prosecuted. "Internet crime requires almost no expense to execute, carries potentially high financial rewards, and involves relatively little risk of being caught and punished," according to the report.

The monetary cost of all this activity isn't cheap, either. In 2007, an estimated $7.1 billion was lost due to phishing, viruses and malware in the United States, alone. Given that the estimated losses in 2006 was a mere $2 billion, this would lead a reasonable person to speculate that the problem is a growing one. Worldwide estimates put the losses at about $100 billion.

The report gives a possible reason for the increase in activity. With few overhead or start-up costs a phishing group can net about $250,000 a month and operate anonymously from just about anywhere in the world.

Do it yourself (DIY) phishing kits for sale on the Internet have been cited as a primary cause of more and more activity, also. Some of these DIY kits even come with technical support. The bottom line is that it no longer takes much technical knowledge to become a phisherman.

The report speculates that we shouldn't be surprised that online fraud and abuse are at high levels and calls for stronger deterrents. They believe that stronger action by the state attorneys general is key to this effort.

While more support at the State level is needed, I'm not sure if the States can control Internet crime all by themselves. Internet crime moves across borders with a click of a mouse and it's going to be difficult for Alabama to prosecute a spammer or phisherman living in Moscow, Shanghai, Montreal or London.

Two so-called spam kings were recently prosecuted by the federal government. One later escaped and killed himself and family members in the process. These arrests didn't seem to make much of a dent in the amount of spam being sent. Both of the government press releases on these stories mentioned they were catering to commercial clients. Any solution to crime on the Internet will have to take a long and hard look at what enables the activity to be too easy to facilitate in the first place.

Some blame the Internet Service Providers (which seem to be a dime a dozen) for looking the other way because spam brings in revenue for them. Of course, auction sites like eBay have long been criticized for looking the other way at the the criminal activity on their sites. Since Internet Service Providers and Auction sites operate worldwide with a click of the mouse, it's difficult to prosecute or investigate anything on the Internet.

This list of Internet crime enablers is long and the one's referenced regarding service providers and auction sites are merely two examples of them. But if you were to take a look at all them, they have one thing in common: which is maintaining an environment conducive to making money easily. The question is how long will it take for the financial and social costs of Internet fraud and abuse to inspire a more responsible and practical approach to the problem?

0 comments

Bills Introduced to Combat Organized Crime on Auction Sites

While stories of individual people getting scammed on auction sites are legendary, individuals aren't only ones victimized on these sites. Large retailers and brand owners are victimized when their stolen or counterfeit merchandise is sold on these sites, also.

In response to this, two bills are being introduced to combat this problem in the halls of Congress.

The reason this has become a growing issue is that criminals can net 70 percent of the value of stolen merchandise on an auction site versus the going 30 percent received on street corners, flea markets and pawn shops. So far as all the knock-off (counterfeit) goods being sold on auction sites, it's hard to put a dollar loss to it, but many believe it's substantial.

According to the International Anticounterfeting Coalition, counterfeiting costs U.S. businesses $200 to $250 billion a year. Counterfeiting and e-fencing pose safety risks to the public-at-large, also. Outdated or merchandise that isn't what it is advertised to be could potentially poison people, or cause bodily harm when it doesn't work like it's supposed to.

Simply stated auction sites, provide an anonymous marketing environment to sell both stolen and counterfeit goods.

“By hiding behind the anonymity of the Internet, they can make more money with less risk of getting caught than selling to a stranger on a street corner who might turn out to be a police officer. This bill would lift that cloak and help law enforcement put on-line criminals where they belong – behind bars,” according to Joe LaRocca, the National Retail Federations Vice President of Loss Prevention.

To address this problem, a federal bill (H.R. 6713, the E-Fencing Enforcement Act of 2008) is being introduced by Representative Bobby Scott, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security.

The bill will require on-line auction operators to maintain information about high-volume sellers and provide the information to a person with "standing" once a police report is filed. The definition of a person of standing would be a law enforcement officer or a representative from a company, who has an interest in the merchandise being illegally sold on an auction site.

This is the second bill introduced recently to combat organized retail crime, which costs retailers anywhere from $15 to 30 billion a year. On July 15th, H.R. 6491, the Organized Retail Crime Act of 2008, was introduced by Representative Brad Ellsworth, a former county sheriff, along Representative Jim Jordan, as the lead co-sponsor. The bill establishes that unless auction site owners can show specific steps to prove goods being sold were not being obtained by theft or fraud, they could be viewed as "facilitating" the activity. This bill will also require site operators to cooperate with the police and organizations with a stake in stopping the activity. In certain instances, it will also allow merchants to initiate civil actions over stolen merchandise being sold on an auction site.

In the past, auction operators have been criticized for not effectively cooperating with companies and law enforcement when they made an inquiry into suspected criminal activity on their sites. It has also been established that smaller (individual) victims and merchants often receive little to no assistance after being victimized in an Internet auction deal.

E-fencing, phishing, counterfeit goods and the use of fraudulent financial instruments to buy merchandise from unsuspecting customers have all victimized countless people and organizations on auction sites.

Criminals often lure people to do their dirty work, also. Recruits are normally harvested off the Internet, sometimes from job sites, and offered work to reship stolen merchandise and or launder money from fraudulent transactions. Much of this activity involves sending money, or hot merchandise across an International border --making it extremely difficult to track.

A lot of criminal activity is facilitated on auction sites by what is known as phishing. Phishing is where an account owner is tricked into giving up their account details, either via social engineering, or more and more often, after downloading some malicious sofware. The stolen account details are then used to take-over the account and use it for illicit purposes.

In fact, eBay and PayPal accounts are frequently the most phished brands out there.

Phishing, normally facilitated by spam e-mails, is another ever-growing criminal activity on the Internet. Recent studies by the Anti Phishing Working Group show that it is becoming more automated and malicious software (crimeware) used to automatically steal information is becoming more prevalent.

There is little doubt that a lot of the criminal activity on auction sites is sophisticated and reeks of organized crime.

For anyone investigating fraud on an auction site, the only way to effectively do so, is to have access to information quickly and with as little red tape as possible. A lot of these crimes cross over borders quickly and by the time and investigator gets what they need, the trail is often pretty cold.

When auction site owners -- who suffer no financial liability and collect a lot of revenue in fees from this activity -- don't cooperate or move too slowly, it only ensures that criminals will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Even the government has had their stolen inventory sold on eBay and Craigslist. In April, the GAO issued a report that military items, including F-14 components, were being sold on auction sites. In August of last year, a U.S. Attorney was quoted as saying that stamps being stolen from self service vending machines with cloned payment cards were being sold on auction sites. At the time, I ran a simple search query and found some pretty good deals on stamps. As of today, these great deals still exist. Many of them are being sold below cost and the last I checked the Postal Service still offers credit. Why would someone sell stamps below cost?

In my opinion, both of the bills don't only serve the large merchants out there, but have the potential to protect everybody from fraud on auction sites. While both of these bills are being driven by the National Retail Federation, I see a lot of benefits to passing them for everyone concerned with fraud on auction sites.

I highly recommend that these other people, join in with the NRF and the Congressmen involved, and support getting these bills passed.

0 comments

Will One Spam King's Conviction and Another's Escape Mean Less E-Trash on the Internet?

Robert Soloway dubbed the "Spam King" was sentenced in Washington yesterday, according to an article in the Seattle Intelligencer.

For his misdeeds, Soloway was sentenced to just under four years. Notably, Soloway was the second person to be prosecuted under the Can-Spam Act. It should also be noted that the prosecutors asked for about twice the time in prison and with good behavior, Soloway will probably only serve about half of the sentence he received.

Like most of the many "Spam Kings" out there, Soloway allegedly used a botnet (army of zombie computers) to saturate the electronic universe with e-trash, including advertisements from commercial clients. To give everybody an idea of the scope of Soloway's activity, he allegedly sent out 90 million e-mails in a three-month period.

The made me wonder if anyone is looking at the commercial clients? Of course, everyone knows that "Spam Kings" send out a lot more than commercial advertisements, including a variety of scams designed to steal from unwary people. They also tout knock-off drugs, merchandise, software and porn.

Spam is also used to deliver malicious software, which can steal all your personal and financial information. Ironically, spam also delivers malware designed to turn a system (part of a botnet), which is then used to send out even more spam.

In fact, spam designed to send out even more spam best describes Soloway's operation. Using a company, Newport Internet Marketing Corporation (NIM), he offered a broadcast e-mail software product and broadcast e-mail services. His website promised a full refund if a customer wasn't satisfied, however in reality, if anyone ever complained they were threatened with financial charges and collection agencies.

According to the Department of Justice press release, one customer tried to complain about the amount of spam he was getting and Soloway's response was to send him even more spam.

The press release also mentions that he willfully failed to pay his taxes after earning more than $300,000 in 2005.

Interestingly, enough another "Spam King," Edward "Eddie" Davidson simply walked out of a minimum security facility in Colorado about the same time Soloway was sentenced. Davis allegedly made $3.5 million spamming for about 20 commercial clients. Like Soloway, he failed to pay any taxes on the proceeds of his misdeeds.

Unfortunately, Soloway's conviction or Davidson's escape is unlikely to make much of a dent in spam anytime in the near future. Earlier this month, Symantec reported blocking 3.5 million spam messages over the 4th of July holiday. Their monthly spam report reported that over 80 percent of all e-mail sent is spam. The 80 percent statistic (and greater) has been a sad fact for several months now.

Notable trends on the last report included using the China earthquake to spread viruses and the use of fake new flashes (like U.S.A. attacks Iran) to net Internet crime victims.

We probably shouldn't be too quick to celebrate Soloway's conviction. He is obviously just one of many "Spam Kings" operating out there. Hopefully, as time goes on, we will see more of these so-called spam superstars put behind bars. After all, just about anything that is distasteful or illegal on the Internet normally starts with a spam e-mail.

On a final note, both Soloway and Davidson seemed to be servicing a lot of commercial clients. Maybe if the legal emphasis shifted towards the people paying spammers, there would be less incentive (money) for spammers to pollute the Internet!

Update (7/25/08): In a horrifying twist to Eddie Davidson's escape, it has now been reported by the AFP that he killed himself after killing his wife and their three month old daughter. Davidson's seven month old son was left in the car unharmed and his sixteen year old daughter was shot in the neck before escaping.

Given these circumstances, I wonder if anyone is going to question why Davidson was locked up in a minumum security facility that he was able to walk away from?

0 comments

Inside CRM publishes 50 ways to protect your privacy!

I got a tip from Fiona King at InsideCRM magazine about an article they published that lists fifty tips to protect your privacy, personal and financial information. InsideCRM represents the customer relationship management industry.

The article intended to provide useful tips to protect the average person from fraud, phishing, and all the assorted financial misdeeds facing the average person in today's world. The tips provide information on how these scams originate and emphasize how a person can take back control of their personal and financial information.

The article covers how to protect yourself both on and offline and how you can track your personal information on the Internet. Although I've seen many of these tips before, putting them all in a one-page format makes this article a useful tool. Along with the fifty tips are useful links, which direct the reader to the source material about the particular tip.

The CRM industry has a stake in fighting the battle against scams that are being made easier by technology. Consumer trust is a key factor in any type of business involving customers.
One growing concern that can give the industry a bad rap (even though the legitimate CRM center had nothing to do with it) is a phenomenon called vishing where personal information is stolen by calling people up on the telephone. This type of activity is a growing phenomenon. In most cases, the crooks impersonate a legitimate organization when doing this.

My personal tip on how not to get caught in a vishing expedition is to remember that no reputable organization will ever call (unsolicited by you) and ask for personal or financial information. If this occurs, a red flag should go up in your head and I recommend verifying the number via a known third party source and calling them back. Do not rely on caller ID; spoofing services (which fake caller ID) numbers are available to anyone with the capital to purchase them on the Internet.

The article lists some useful tips when dealing with VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) technology, which many believe is the cause in the recent surge of vishing activity. The reason for this is that it has made calling long distance cheap and vishing scams now come from all over the world, making them hard to investigate or trace.

Additionally, CRM centers often deal in personal and financial information. One of the biggest consumer trust issues that faces the industry is when information is breached from within a CRM center. Recent reports of information being stolen at CRM centers have made internal security at CRM centers a priority.

Please note that CRM centers are not the only places personal and financial information are compromised. This is becoming a sad reality and any business that deals in "information" needs to be aware of the potential risks of having this valuable commodity stolen from under their noses.

Most technology scams involve healthy does of social engineering (human trickery) to make them work. Education is the best defense against social engineering and InsideCRM has provided all of us with a valuable tool to do this with!

0 comments

Phishermen stealing food from the mouths of Children

It never ceases to amaze me how cyber criminals seem to have NO conscience, whatsoever.

The FBI and IC3 are reporting that EPPICards, which are set up as debit cards to disburse child support payments are the latest target of the phishermen.

In this instance, they are literally stealing food from the mouths of children.

From the FBI press release:

The FBI and its partner, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3), have received reports of phishing attacks targeting users of EPPICards. The EPPICard is similar to a debit card. EPPICards are issued by a state agency for the purpose of receiving child-support payments. The cards are currently used in 15 states.

Individuals have reported receiving e-mail or text messages indicating a problem with their account. They are directed to follow the link provided in the message to update their account or correct the problem. The link actually directs the individuals to a fraudulent web site where their personal information, such as account number and PIN, is compromised.

My humble guess is that if a parent is being forced to support their children by loading funds on a EPPIcard, the kids in question could really use the money.

If you happen to spot one of these phishing or vishing attempts, please take the time to report it to IC3.

If you want to learn more about phishing and other related Internet scams, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recently posted a series of videos on YouTube that can be viewed, here.

Full press release, here.

0 comments

Large scale data theft of U.S. information uncovered in India

Stealing personal and financial information in large quantities isn't just a problem in North America and the Europe Union. As more IT functions are outsourced to a variety of countries, this information might be getting compromised from just about anywhere.

Recently, it was disclosed in the Indian press that a large amount of data was stolen by an Indian BPO from a company in United States. It's amazing this story didn't get very much coverage in the West, despite the fact that the data was stolen from a company called Noble Ventures, which is based in Florida? As a slight disclaimer ComputerWorld (Norway) and CIO (Australia) did cover the story, but I was unable to find anything about it in the American press.

I suppose in this instance we will have to rely on the Indian media to provide some transparency to this event. Parth Shastri at TNN reports:

It could well be one of the biggest data thefts in the country. An Ahmedabad-based BPO owner, Maulik Dave, has been accused of data theft from a Florida-based company and selling them to its rival companies in the US.

Dave stole data worth Rs 1 crore (ten million) from the company. With the help of his accomplice based in the US, Milan Dabhi, he sold the data to competitors of the company in the US.

Apparently this occurred after Dave got his contract cancelled with Noble Ventures Inc., who "provides customer database of 1.25 crore (ten million) US citizens to various marketing companies in the US and also has a client-base in other international markets," according to the TNN article.

Of even greater concern to me was the deduction (my speculation) that Dave had insider access to their systems after his contract was cancelled? From the article, it is unclear if this was because the access was never removed, or if he got it from another Noble Ventures employee, Milan Dabhi, who is based in the U.S. and allegedly Dave's accomplice.

In another article published by the IT Examiner in India a person claiming to be a spokesman for Noble Ventures, Sunny Vaghela with credentials as a cyber crime expert, claimed that the information was stolen, but never sold. The rationale for this was that Noble Ventures reported the theft to Indian authorities and a sting (?) was conducted.

From the IT examiner article:

He further added claiming the theft report of 12.5 million Americans’ personal and professional records to be untrue as he assumed of some kind of miscommunication between the reporters and the Police.

While I hope this is true, the logic in this is flawed (my opinion) because the information was stolen by someone, who had inside access prior to the discovery that the data was being compromised. How can it be determined that it was never sold to anyone else? Information is bought and sold in a lot of places, including underground Internet forums set up for illicit purposes. Additionally, no matter where it might have been sold, it is unlikely that anyone, who bought it illegally is going to stand up and be counted in this affair.

I went to the Noble Ventures site and they offer a lot of information for a price. Targeted data on executives, "heroes" (police and firemen), veterans and a slew of other marketing segments can be obtained. They even sell e-mail lists.

While I couldn't determine if this information was enough to open a line of credit, it could certainly be used to mount telemarketing scams, spam campaigns and even whaling (phishing) expeditions like the recent one we've seen targeting executives in the United States. Verisign just reported that 15,000 white collar types were speared in this expedition.

Please note that even though I am assuming no financial or SSN information was compromised -- if a dose of social engineering, phishing or malicious software is added to the equation -- getting the rest of the information to commit identity theft would probably be fairly easy.

Incidents, such as this, continue to point to the fact that there is too much information being stored in too many not very well protected places. In fact, this incident might point to the fact that the problem is getting worse.

We also need to remember that this information came from a U.S. company, and although I don't know where the server was physically located, it didn't have to be located in India for this to have occurred.

Information like this is protected by the FTC's Telemarketing Sales Rule.

Violations in the United States of this rule can be reported, here.

TNN story from India can be seen in full, here.

ComputerWorld, Norway story about this, here.

CIO Australia story, here.

0 comments